Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 04:50
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
CNN Gets A Big Viewership Bump With Live Telecast Of ‘Good Night, And Good Luck’ - Deadline
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Are people who cite the 2nd Amendment honestly familiar with what it establishes?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Full-screen Xbox handheld UI is coming to all Windows PCs “starting next year” - Ars Technica
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What are the strangest feeding mechanisms found in sea creatures?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
How can you tell if someone is cunning?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Mario Kart World Coins Don't Function As You'd Expect, New Evidence Suggests - GameSpot
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.